AroraBarak-errata
From CRYPTUTOR
[edit]
Contributed Errata and Suggestions for Arora-Barak webdraft
The version referred to is "Web draft 2007-01-08 21:59."
Contents |
[edit]
Errata
[edit]
Chapter 1
- Section 1.2.1: In the definition of a TM, Γ,Q are finite sets. After Figure 1.2, it should be
(not
) and
(not
. On the next page, right at the top it says "The machine will be in state q', and the k + 1 heads will move Left, Right or Stay..." The machine only has k heads. Also, may want to explicity say that
(first tape being input, and last being output).
[edit]
Chapter 2
- Page 2.10: At the bottom of the page (item 2), it should be
(not
).
- Definition 2.21:
, not
.
- Problem 2.2: The theorem to be proved is 2.9 not 2.
- Problem 2.11: "...certificates of f is equal to..." should be "...certificates of x is equal to..."
[edit]
Chapter 3
- Proof of Thm 3.3: Overloading of f.
[edit]
Chapter 4
- Example 4.9: x = y (not
).
- Section 4.3.1: First paragraph, "PSPACE = NSPACE" should read "PSPACE = NPSPACE".
- Theorem 4.11: p4.8 line 2 - the second C' should be C", line 6 - the C' s should be C" s and the last C" should be C'.
- Proof of Theorem 4.12: line -3 - the algorithm makes "M" recursive invocations, not "n". (Also M is overloaded in the proof).
- Proof of Theorem 4.18: line 3 - reachable from "s", not "u".
[edit]
Chapter 5
- Remark 5.5:
(not
)
- Proof of Theorem 5.15, page 98: "using choices
" should be "using choices
"
[edit]
Chapter 6
- Definition 6.21: depth O(login) (not O(logdn)), and constant fan-in. Constant fan-in was not mentioned in the definition (perhaps that was the purpose of d?).
- Before Theorem 6.24: "classes AC, NC" should just be NC. Should point out that AC = NC before that.
- Problem 6.11:
(not NC1 = L).
- Definition 6.28: "i'th but" should be "i'th bit".
[edit]
Chapter 7
- Proof of Theorem 7.10: k = 8 | x | 2c + d (not 8 | x | 2d + c). Also, Corollary 7.11 should have
(not
). Then plugging in
(not
), (and δ = n − c / 2), the bound is
(not
).
- Proof of Theorem 7.18: probability that Br happens is at most 2 − nk (not (1 − 2 − n)k).
[edit]
Chapter 8
- Definition 8.10: The value of the probability expression should be 2 − 2k not 2 − 2n.
- Proof of Claim 8.13.1: In the last line,
(not
).
[edit]
Chapter 9
- Example 9.1: Should be "induced subgraphs" (not "subgraphs").
- Proof of Theorem 9.8: Clause gadget uses a pair of parallel edges (between the two lower nodes). Needs to be fixed by inserting a node with self-loop in the inner edge. XOR gadget seems to have errors: v' should have an outgoing edge and v should have an incoming edge to be consistent with the symbolic representation.
- pg 9.12 (before Proof of Lemma 9.18): φ + ψ(z) should be
(assuming
).
[edit]
Other Chapters
- Section 18.2.1, Equation (2):
(not
.
- Example 11-6:
and
should be
and
, respectively (i.e, off-by-one). Base case should also be k = 0, not 1.
- Theorem 22.1: Should be "μ(f) − 1 is a lowerbound" (instead of μ(f)).
[edit]
Appendices
- A.4.1 Non-Prime Fields, second paragraph, where "For every prime q and k..." should be "For every prime q and every
... "
[edit]

